Child Second Language Acquisition

Running head : CHILD L2 ACQUISITIONChild stake dustup Acquisitionand its Similarities toAdult get it on Language AcquisitionDoes sister flash vocabulary (cL2 ) achievement pit adult secondly oral communication (aL2 ) attainment or does it treat common properties with first language (L1 ) accomplishment ? This is a brain that Meisel (2004 ) has tried to clarify in his (p . 55 ) and this is the question this analyze on would attempt to answerBased on the existing body of writings on second language accomplishment , this sets forth the bid : Second language (L2 acquisition of children is more comparable to second language (L2 acquisition of adults than to first language (L1 ) acquisition . so , the analogousities of child L2 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition will be presented , discussed and examined beneath . These similarities , which are taken from the findings of research studies conducted by lingual researchers such as Meisel (2004 , Marinis (2007 , Guasti (2004 ) among others , are group into four categoriesFirst , cL2 acquisition is similar to aL2 acquisition in the area of grammatical acquire curiously in the domain of morphology and syntax . This meaning that second language acquisition of children is similar to second language acquisition of adults in terms of the forms and positions of verbs personad in sentences . This point is oppose by the results in Pienemann (1981 , cited in Meisel , 2004 . Meisel (2004 presented specific grammatical features that cultivate this through the results of a cross-sectional study involving 14 children with ages 5 to 7 years old who were bilingual German- French learners and monolingual French learners (p . 60 ) and a quasi-longitudinal study involving 35 children who were sort out according to the length of their exposure to Frenc h (p .64 . The findings of the studies showe! d that (a L2 children are akin L2 adults who bulge bounded verbs in the correct position . That is , L2 children custom finite verb forms where it is required (p .

61- 62 (b ) Second language children sharpen the French non-clitic yields in preverbal position adjacent to the verb just esteem well what L2 adults do (p . 67 (c ) Child L2 learners approve monster finite verbs as well as a subject clitic with countless verb forms which adult L2 learners also exhibit (p . 67 (d ) L2 children combine two finite verbs rather than combining finite elements with myriad thematic verbs which is similar to L2 adults behavior (p . 69 (e ) Second Language children prove the same behavior of combining subject clitics with innumerable verb forms as that of second language adults (p 69 (f ) Child L2 learners dedicate the negator non before the verb to be negated like adult L2 learners do (p . 71However , it is hassle to none that in the light of this similarity of cL2 and aL2 in the acquisition of the morphological and syntactical domain , some researchers do not agree in their findings with the results of the studies of other researchers . For one , the conclusions of Meisel (2004 ) state that it is exactly in the morphological domain that child L2 is like aL2 (p...If you film to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay